Consistency between browsers
Why is it that both professional web producers and clients alike insists on comparing the look and feel between different browsers? Especially between what is considered Alpha browsers (Firefox2+, IE7+, Safari 2/3b and Opera 9+) and Beta browsers like Internet Explorer 6 – the scourge of the internet.
I understand everything there is about presenting a coherent look and feel, that presents the clients brand in a consistent way.
But let’s face it: It doesn’t matter. The target group will not sit there with 4 different browsers open, comparing the differences! Most likely they will either never update their browsers because of lazy IT staff (I mean you Simon Hill 
, and therefore never see a proper version of the site.
Or if they are relatively IT-competent, they keep their browser updated at least at home.
Now, my argument is this: intentionally MAKE sites look really good in Alpha browsers, and passable in Beta and below. Why? Because coding for deprecated browsers take a lot of time, and cost a lot of money.
“Oh but if you code correctly, you don’t need to worry about that” and “Over 90% use Internet Explorer 6″ I hear you cry!
Absolute bull! I am not talking about browser snobbery, trying to convince people to switch to standards compatible browsers like Opera, Firefox and Safari, but to simply reward people who keep their browsers and computers up to date.
If people insist on using old style browsers, then they just won’t get the full experience. Simple as that.
And also, if there is a difference of 2 pixels here and there when compared between browsers – IT DOESN’T MATTER. The user experience will not vary because of this anyway! As long as the general composition is the same, and typography adhered to, then this is a moot point.
